A student-centered education is a wise choice

下面为大家整理一篇 的essay代写范文 -- A student-centered education is a wise choice，文章讲述人们大力提倡近代教育，而人们对教育重要性的认识越来越高。如今，一种不可避免的趋势是，令人惊讶的令人信服的理由支持教师从事或对之进行研究。教育。此外，一些教育政策的不断提出也有助于提高教育者对所有受教育的年轻学生的影响的重要性。众所周知，以教师为导向的教学水平和以学生为导向的教学水平已经运行了多年，同时引起了师生之间的争论，因为它引发了关于如何有效的任何一种方法都会影响当前的教学方法。

 

A student-centered education is a wise choice

Highly advocated is education in modern times and more and more increasing is human beings’ awareness toward the importance of education, nowadays it has been an inevitable trend that there are surprisingly compelling reasons in support of teachers undertaking, or contributing to, research in and of education. Moreover, the continuous proposal of several education policies as well has helped to contribute to the significance of the educators’ influence toward all young students being educated. As is known to us, the teachers-oriented level of instruction and the students-oriented level of instruction have been in operation over years and have in the meantime aroused the controversy among both the teachers and students in that it has begged the question on how effective either method can influence the current methods of teaching or learning. At the same time, it is imperative to identify the type of instruction that best suits the education system that exists at present. If we want to correctly identify the type of instruction that best suits the education system that exists at present, then it is a must for us to mention a new idea that developed in American education between 1880 and 1945, which is to implement education based on the interests and needs of the child. Such new idea originated from the development of pedagogical progressivism and administrative progressivism and had in its later process brought about a new kind of education, which is students-oriented education.

Then a problem comes out accordingly that whether the teachers-oriented level of instruction or the students-oriented level of instruction is more effective and successful in carrying out the essence of education. Whenever it comes to the idea that the teachers-oriented level of instruction can be more effective and successful in carrying out the essence of instruction, a negative voice will always cry out that the students-oriented level of instruction will undoubtedly be a wiser choice for the impletion of the essence of education. There is no doubt that I am personally in favor of the latter opinion that the students-oriented level of instruction matters more, which will be elaborately in detail in the following.

Within every system, there must be a set of guidelines and regulations set up to guarantee the normative and orderly development of education activities as it has decided what roles should teachers and students play within mainly through the use of instructions. In order to achieve the efficiency that is as high as possible. From our reading materials having been looked through, it can be found that the level of students-oriented instruction can realize the cultivation of the best form of communication between teachers and students. It cannot be denied that both levels of instructions have their own advantages and disadvantages for education, while the advantages of students-oriented level of instruction weigh more than that of the teachers-oriented level of instruction.

First and foremost comes that the students-oriented level of instruction is more effective in that the teachers will teach according to the needs of students but not directly instill the thoughts to students when they don’t understand them at all. What is described in [1] just shows this: “the general method has been to first furnish the pupils with an outline of the work to be covered and to assign lessons from the text in conformity with this, and then to lead them by conversations to discover the reasons to think out the results.” In this way, students themselves have not got anything from the teaching from their teachers even if the teachers do have a well-knit knowledge base and professional expertise out of their experience and definiteness in the past years. Instead, the students-oriented level of instruction signifies the principles of “implementing teaching in accordance of students’ respective aptitude” and “students are the focus and center of the whole class”. That is to say, in order to carry out education toward all the young students, the educators must ingrain themselves the view that they should try different ways to educate the educated according to their different situation both before birth and after birth. Only in this way can the students on different levels actually learn something from the teacher’s lecturing bit by bit.

 what comes next at the list of why students-oriented level of instruction concerns more also lies in that this level of instruction play high premiums on the participation of various students in the class but not only those top students. Or maybe we can put it another way that this level of instruction emphasizes the dynamics of each and every student that is within the system in hope for the common development of all students in the end. The common development of all students can at the same time restore the talents needed for the construction for the whole country in the future as they are generally acknowledged as the main source of the contributing factors for the development of the whole country.

Furthermore, we can have a fair knowledge that the enthusiasm and activeness to take part in the classroom activities can also affect others and drive them to be a member of the big group to participate in the classroom activities more and more frequently. The participation of more students in class can absolutely result in a higher flexibility in decision making as it varies from one learner to the other, thus the classroom atmosphere will also change to be a more active one. Also what may be unobvious but must have to be referred to is that the enthusiasm and activeness to take part in the classroom activities of students can in return lead to the increase of the teacher’s motive to lecture so as to pass their knowledge to their students as much as possible, as is the so-called duty and mission of the teachers. We can naturally draw a conclusion that the students can have a better performance in their studies as they have been drowned in an unprecedentedly active atmosphere consisting of mutual help and peer instruction.

 However, some people may say that if the teacher gives the initiative to students in the classroom, then it is inevitable that some students will distract their attention to something that is not related to their study but ranging far away in the fields. In this way, students may not listen to the teachers at all, let alone they can perform better on their study under that situation. While if they are supervised by their teachers, they will be forbidden to divert their attention to something unrelated more or less and may focus on the classroom activities instead to improve themselves. But what is ignored by those people is that even if those students are forced by their teachers to put their attention on the study, they are not willing to it at all and may instead have some reversal mind as well. What is a pity is that such reversal mind will make those students think badly of their teachers, under the impact of which they will not listen to their teachers any longer but rather may go against what their teachers hold. In the long run, it may turn out to be worse and hard to imagine. From this we can see that the performance of the students on their study has also largely been dependent on their own attitudes toward their study and their teachers as well but not all the efforts of the teachers alone. The importance of oneself to his own destiny can also be shown in [2] as “the force of his intellect and his incredible energy were undoubtedly vital ingredients in Harris’s national stature.”

Last but not the least is that students-oriented level of instruction is conducive to the selection of what to teach in class, which is to choose what is needed by the students and what is helpful to those but not teach everything according to the arrangement in the textbooks without any personal thinking on that. It is indicated in [3] as well in that “it just made it all the more difficult under those circumstances to see organized knowledge as related to human needs and human aspirations”. The past experiences of teaching simply according to the teachers’ hobbies have witnessed a big failure in conducting the teaching activities, which is indicative of a fact in turn that choose the teaching materials based on the students’ needs and interest will be favorable and preferred to a certain degree. It can be easily understood in that everyone tends to possess higher interest toward their own interesting areas and will successively pay more attention to it for further exploration on it. While teaching what teachers hold to be more important to students may be boring to the students, some extent of such materials should be combined with the other materials as well in that the materials chosen by the teachers are inherently professional and indispensable for the all-rounded development of students themselves. We can imagine that if the students only learn those that are their interest and don’t get access to other useful information, then they may come out as a kind of person that is lack of the knowledge of other fields that are not of their interest. In the long run, it is not suitable for their personal development and may suffer due to their being overboard on one or some subjects but being ignorant on other subjects.

To sum up, why the students-oriented level of instruction will undoubtedly be a wiser choice for the impletion of the essence of education when compared with the teachers-oriented level of instruction can be summarized as the following three aspects: it encourages the carrying out of the principles of “implementing teaching in accordance of students’ respective aptitude” and “students are the focus and center of the whole class”; it plays high premiums on the participation of various students in the class but not only those top students in hope for the common development of all students by emphasizing the dynamics of each and every student that is within the system; it is conducive to the selection of what to teach in class, which is to choose what is needed by the students and what is helpful to them combined with what teachers themselves hold as indispensable for the development of the students.

Conclusively education is an important facet in any society all around the world, due to which it is a necessity to determine the specific techniques that can take effect to achieve the required results in the most efficient ways. This poses a question onto the best type of instruction that is worthwhile to call for one’s due consideration. These two forms of instructions have been in play over a century ago. By considering the role played by these techniques, the flaws and strengths in the education system over the years will be put to perspective. This will in turn lead to the necessary changes being made, in line with the need for a stable and productive education system. And a stable and productive education system can only result from the students-oriented level of instruction, which is just what makes it to be a wiser choice for the carrying out of the essence of education in the history.

 

 

References

1. Chapter 1 Teaching at the Turn of the Century: Tradition and Challenge. 1890-1990. Progressive and Classroom Practice.

2. Harris, Hall and the appearance of John Dewey on the educational scene. The Struggle for the American Curriculum. The Curriculum versus the Child.

3. The Curriculum of the Dewey School. The Struggle for the American Curriculum.

 

Essay学霸留学教育原创版权郑重声明：原创 代写范文源自编辑创作，未经官方许可，网站谢绝转载。对于侵权行为，未经同意的情况下，Essay学霸有权追究法律责任。主要业务有essay代写、assignment代写、paper代写、作业代写服务。

Essay学霸为留学生提供更好 的作业代写服务，亲们可以进入主页了解和获取更多代写范文提供作业代写服务，详情可以咨询我们的客服微信：ada100-1。