Response to Rossum’s Universal Robot

下面Essay学霸教员组为大家整理一篇 的代写范文- Response to Rossum’s Universal Robot，供大家参考学习。这篇文章讲述的是罗素（Karsum Capek）的科幻小说《罗森（Rossum）的环球机器人》代表了“机器人”一词的 使用以及它的现代用法，该词被用来描述一个人造人，并且将机器人概念化为像人类一样能够创造的事物乏味的重复任务。看完这部戏之后，我的 印象是这与人工智能有关，我从内部学到了很多东西。

Response to Rossum’s Universal Robot

Rossum’s Universal Robots, a science fiction play by Karel Capek, represents the first use of the word “robot” as well as its modern usage which is applied to describe an artificial person and it has conceptualize the robots as human-like creations able to do dull repetitive tasks. After reading this play, my first impression is that it is one about artificial intelligence and I have really learned a lot from within.

Firstly, I have learned that humans have to take the responsibility for their own behaviors under whatever situation. To put it more specifically, the robots are forged to be a servant class for human beings and they are supposed to be a source of efficient and inexpensive labor in human society. In this way, people can all get themselves rid of the drudgery of manual work and the individuals can have more time and energies to perfect themselves step by step. There is no doubt that robot-based economy will gradually appear due to the robots’ accounting for the major part of labor force and people have no idea that those robots can even present a danger. But what is out of humans’ expectation is that those mass-produced robots desire for freedom out of their owning will and emotions so that they are unwilling to be enslaved any more. Then they begin to revolt and rebel and they launch a robot revolution to annihilate the human race. As a result, all people are killed except for Alquist, one of their masters.

Based on this, a fair knowledge can be obtained that the death of all people except one can be deemed as a result of their own actions of reproducing those robots in the first beginning. It can be understood in this way that if humans do not reproduce those robots to do a series of manual work for them originally, then it won’t result in the extinction of the human race at all in the end. In this sense, we can get that humans have to be responsible for their own behaviors and they have to pay for their actions sooner or later.

Moreover, humanity should be something that is shown from the bottom of one’s heart. Detailed speaking, Helena Glory, standing for a humanitarian organization, comes to the island factory with the mission to free those robots. It seems that her behaviors are humane and she is showing great humanity toward the robots. From the perspective of Helena, robots have a “soul” the same as humans and robots should be given freedom. However, the rest of people hold that robots are appliances working for them and robots have no human sensibilities. Consequently, the intention to liberate those robots tends to be ridiculous and futile and humans’ being inhumane toward those robots makes it hard to liberate those robots more or less. In the opposite, if true humanity would like to be conducted, then robots should be given equal rights as humans and they should not be manipulated to simply work for humans without being cared for. Also, those robots should be free to do whatever they like but not follow the orders of humans as for what they should do.

Personally speaking, this play has also motivated me to reflect on the relationship between men and nowadays’ technology and how men should take advantage of technology in their daily life. Though I do not have the habit to read for a second time, I have decided to read it again in approaching days for further information.

Essay学霸留学教育原创版权郑重声明：原创 代写范文源自编辑创作，未经官方许可，网站谢绝转载。对于侵权行为，未经同意的情况下，Essay学霸有权追究法律责任。主要业务有essay代写、assignment代写、paper代写、作业代写服务。    Essay学霸为留学生提供更好 的作业代写服务，亲们可以进入主页了解和获取更多代写范文提供作业代写服务，详情可以咨询我们的客服QQ：3084929832。